From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Williams Subject: Re: blatant GPL violation of ext2 and reiserfs filesystem drivers Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 13:41:56 +1100 Message-ID: <43ACB574.7000101@bigpond.net.au> References: <200512240148.jBO1mlqx022718@quelen.inf.utfsm.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Scott Mansfield , Bryan Henderson , Ben Slusky , "Robert W. Fuller" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, LKML Kernel , Kyle Moffett , Steven Rostedt Return-path: Received: from omta01ps.mx.bigpond.com ([144.140.82.153]:33090 "EHLO omta01ps.mx.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030610AbVLXCl6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:41:58 -0500 To: Horst von Brand In-Reply-To: <200512240148.jBO1mlqx022718@quelen.inf.utfsm.cl> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Horst von Brand wrote: > Scott Mansfield wrote: > >>>>Developer replies that the source code will be provided >>>>only to paying customers: > > >>>Not really. Developer does make the bizarre statement that "paid >>>customers" are entitled to source code, > > > Read the GPL: You get the binary, you are entitled to the source. You have > no binary, wellll... > > Sure, you can get the binary (legally!) from somebody else, and then you > are entitled to source. But the obligation to provide you with the source is on the person who gave you the binary not the person who sold him the binary. -- Peter Williams pwil3058@bigpond.net.au "Learning, n. The kind of ignorance distinguishing the studious." -- Ambrose Bierce