From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: hugh@veritas.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lee.schermerhorn@hp.com,
Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com, vs <vs@thebsh.namesys.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.16-rc-mm4 reiser4 calls try_to_unmap() with 1 arg -- now takes 2
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 10:42:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43E64702.9020205@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060205011152.7f9b7aa9.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
>Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Umm, no, copy on capture needs to get enabled again as soon as we get
>> past issues outsiders care about, and start dealing again with improving
>> the code in the ways we think matter. There are real problems that are
>> addressed by copy on capture. That it has not been worked on since
>> 2.6.5 just sadly indicates how successful folks have been in distracting
>> us for so long.
>>
>>
>
>Dinking with rmap internals from within a filesystem is a real problem.
>Whatever needs to be done there should be done within core MM if it's done
>anywhere so it actually gets maintained by the people who are likely to
>break it.
>
>Something like
>http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13-rc4/2.6.13-rc4-mm1/broken-out/add-page-becoming-writable-notification.patch
>might be what you're after.
>
>
>
>
>
I don't actually care (at least I desire that I not have to care ;-) )
about the implementation of copy-on-capture so long as it works. I am
sure vs will be happy to do it within core mm when we get to where he
can pay attention to it again.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-05 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060205003039.3067e43c.akpm@osdl.org>
2006-02-05 8:45 ` Fw: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.16-rc-mm4 reiser4 calls try_to_unmap() with 1 arg -- now takes 2 Hans Reiser
2006-02-05 9:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-02-05 18:42 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43E64702.9020205@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=lee.schermerhorn@hp.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vs@thebsh.namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).