public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: What should dcache routines should be called at the end of mkdir?
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:36:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4432.1176914169@redhat.com> (raw)


Hi Al,

What d_xxx() functions should I call at the end of a filesystem mkdir() op?

It would seem that I've got two choices:

 (1) just d_instantiate() (as ext2), or

 (2) d_instantiate() and d_rehash() both (as NFS).

If I pick (1), then if I do:

	mkdir /afs/.cambridge.redhat.com/afsdoc/jump/q

I see:

	==> afs_permission({{20000001:1},0},1,)
	==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000001:6} n=.cambridge.redhat.com fl=20},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000003:1},0},1,)
	==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000003:2} n=afsdoc fl=20},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000006:1},0},1,)
	==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000006:5} n=jump fl=0},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000006:5},0},1,)
	==> afs_permission({{20000006:5},0},1,)
	==> afs_lookup({20000006:5},ffff81003344cac8{q},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000006:5},0},3,)
	==> afs_mkdir({20000006:5},{q},755)
	    vnode modified 13 on {20000006:5}
	    not hashed
	==> afs_d_delete(jump)

The "not hashed" indicates that d_unhashed() was true when called after the
d_instantiate().

And then if I do:

	ls /afs/.cambridge.redhat.com/afsdoc/jump/q

I see:

	==> afs_permission({{20000001:1},0},1,)
	==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000001:6} n=.cambridge.redhat.com fl=20},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000003:1},0},1,)
	==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000003:2} n=afsdoc fl=20},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000006:1},0},1,)
	==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000006:5} n=jump fl=c},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000006:5},c},1,)
	==> afs_lookup({20000006:5},ffff81003344c9c0{q},)
	    zap data {20000006:5}
	==> afs_d_delete(q)

In this case, afs_lookup() is called extraneously...  But it does seem to
work.


However, if I pick (2), an do the mkdir, I see:

	==> afs_permission({{20000001:1},0},1,)
	...
	==> afs_lookup({20000006:5},ffff81003344c180{q},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000006:5},0},3,)
	==> afs_mkdir({20000006:5},{q},755)
	    vnode modified 1b on {20000006:5}
	    not hashed

Which is as before, except that afs_d_delete() is *not* called.  Then if do
the "ls" again, I see:

	==> afs_permission({{20000001:1},0},1,)
	==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000001:6} n=.cambridge.redhat.com fl=20},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000003:1},0},1,)
	==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000003:2} n=afsdoc fl=20},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000006:1},0},1,)
	==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000006:5} n=jump fl=c},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000006:5},c},1,)
	==> afs_permission({{20000001:1},0},1,)
	==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000001:6} n=.cambridge.redhat.com fl=20},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000003:1},0},1,)
	==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000003:2} n=afsdoc fl=20},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000006:1},0},1,)
	==> afs_d_revalidate({v={20000006:5} n=jump fl=c},)
	==> afs_permission({{20000006:5},c},1,)
	==> afs_permission({{20000006:7},0},4,)

There's no call to afs_d_revalidate() for 'q' which is decidedly fishy...
Furthermore:

 (1) d_release() isn't called for 'q' when I unmount the filesystem.

 (2) if I delete 'q' on the server and do the ls again, then although listing
     jump no longer shows 'q' to be there, the dentry is clearly still there
     as I can list it directly:

	[root@andromeda ~]# mkdir /afs/.cambridge.redhat.com/afsdoc/jump/q
	[root@andromeda ~]# ls /afs/.cambridge.redhat.com/afsdoc/jump/q
	[root@andromeda ~]# ls /afs/.cambridge.redhat.com/afsdoc/jump
	q/
     <delete 'q' on server>
	[root@andromeda ~]# ls /afs/.cambridge.redhat.com/afsdoc/jump
	[root@andromeda ~]# ls /afs/.cambridge.redhat.com/afsdoc/jump/q
	[root@andromeda ~]#

Any suggestions as what I need to do?  I've tried working it out from NFS, but
I must have missed something.

David

             reply	other threads:[~2007-04-18 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-18 16:36 David Howells [this message]
2007-04-18 21:00 ` What should dcache routines should be called at the end of mkdir? David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4432.1176914169@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox