public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: srinivasa <srinivasa@in.ibm.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, srinivds@in.ibm.com
Subject: Corruption in "b_assoc_buffer" list of bufferhead structure.
Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 11:41:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <446032AE.8030600@in.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi
  I have got a oops  in which "b_assoc_buffer" list of bufferhead is 
getting corrupted with strange values. It looks like a race problem 
,which is not reproducable at everytime. 
When I looked in to the code,I found that  "b_assoc_buffer" list is 
protected by a spinlock on "private_lock" of struct address_space. But 
there is one situation,where I suspect the chance of corruption. that is 
in try_to_free_buffers() of fs/buffer.c
When mapping becomes NULL, there is no lock protection and if 2 or more 
processors passes this condition and executes drop_buffers() 
simultaneously, there may be a chance of list corruption.

So could somebody please explain whether this situation exists or not?
======================================================================

int try_to_free_buffers(struct page *page)
{
        struct address_space * const mapping = page->mapping;
        struct buffer_head *buffers_to_free = NULL;
        int ret = 0;

        BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
        if (PageWriteback(page))
                return 0;

        if (mapping == NULL) {      /* can this still happen? */ <<<<here is my doubt>>>>>>
                ret = drop_buffers(page, &buffers_to_free);
                goto out;
        }

        spin_lock(&mapping->private_lock);
        ret = drop_buffers(page, &buffers_to_free);
        if (ret) {
                /*
                 * If the filesystem writes its buffers by hand (eg ext3)
                 * then we can have clean buffers against a dirty page.  We
                 * clean the page here; otherwise later reattachment of
buffers
                 * could encounter a non-uptodate page, which is
unresolvable.
                 * This only applies in the rare case where
try_to_free_buffers
                 * succeeds but the page is not freed.
                 */
                clear_page_dirty(page);
        }
        spin_unlock(&mapping->private_lock);
=========================================================================================


Thanks
Srinivasa DS





             reply	other threads:[~2006-05-09 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-09  6:11 srinivasa [this message]
2006-05-09 21:13 ` Corruption in "b_assoc_buffer" list of bufferhead structure Mingming Cao
2006-05-11 10:45   ` srinivasa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=446032AE.8030600@in.ibm.com \
    --to=srinivasa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivds@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox