From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 10:35:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4489874C.1020108@garzik.org> References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060609091327.GA3679@infradead.org> <44898476.80401@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel , Mingming Cao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Alex Tomas In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Alex Tomas wrote: >>>>>> Jeff Garzik (JG) writes: > > JG> And thus, inodes are progressively incompatible with older > JG> kernels. Boot into an older kernel, and you can now only read half > JG> your filesystem (if it even allows mount at all). > > nope, you aren't allowed to mount fs with extents-enabled files > by ext3 which has no the feature compiled in. the same will > happen if you call it ext4. This is my point... why increase user confusion by calling it ext3, then? Extent magnify the "what ext3 filesystem am I talking to, today?" problem. Jeff