From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:01:20 -0400
Message-ID: <4489C580.7080001@garzik.org>
References: <1149816055.4066.60.camel@dyn9047017069.beaverton.ibm.com>
	<4488E1A4.20305@garzik.org>
	<20060609083523.GQ5964@schatzie.adilger.int>
	<44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0606090836160.5498@g5.osdl.org>
	<m33beecntr.fsf@bzzz.home.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0606090913390.5498@g5.osdl.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0606090933130.5498@g5.osdl.org>
	<20060609181020.GB5964@schatzie.adilger.int>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0606091114270.5498@g5.osdl.org>
	<m31wty9o77.fsf@bzzz.home.net>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0606091137340.5498@g5.osdl.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0606091347590.5541@turbotaz.ourhouse>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	ext2-devel <ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Tomas <alex@clusterfs.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Return-path: <ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606091347590.5541@turbotaz.ourhouse>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ext2-devel>,
	<mailto:ext2-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=ext2-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:ext2-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ext2-devel>,
	<mailto:ext2-devel-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Chase Venters wrote:
> Now, granted, I really do agree with you about the whole code sharing 
> thing. A fresh start is often just what you need. I'm just questioning 
> if it wouldn't be better to do this fresh start immediately after going 
> 48-bit, rather than before. That way, existing users that want that 
> extra umph can have it today.

Then you continue to crap up the code with

	if (48bit)
		...
	else
		...

etc.

The proper way to do this is "cp -a ext3 ext4" (excluding JBD as Andrew 
mentioned), and then let evolution take its course.

"Evolution" means the standard Linux developement -- patch the kernel, 
patch e4fsprogs, test, lather rinse repeat.  The best development 
platform for new features is one that _works_, and keeps working.

	Jeff