From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 16:04:26 -0400 Message-ID: <4489D44A.1080700@garzik.org> References: <44898EE3.6080903@garzik.org> <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org> <448997FA.50109@garzik.org> <44899A1C.7000207@garzik.org> <4489B83E.9090104@sbcglobal.net> <20060609181426.GC5964@schatzie.adilger.int> <4489C34B.1080806@garzik.org> <20060609194959.GC10524@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: Theodore Tso , Jeff Garzik , Matthew Frost , Alex Tomas , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060609194959.GC10524@thunk.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Theodore Tso wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 02:51:55PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> ext3 is already essentially xiafs-on-life-support, when you consider >> today's large storage systems and today's filesystem technology. Just >> look at the ugly hacks needed to support expanding an ext3 filesystem >> online. > > And what ugly hacks are you talking about? It's actually quite clean; > with the latest e2fsprogs, you use the same command (resize2fs) for > doing both online and offline resizing. Consider a blkdev of size S1. Using LVM we increase that value under the hood to size S2, where S2 > S1. We perform an online resize from size S1 to S2. The size and alignment of any new groups added will different from the non-resize case, where mke2fs was run directly on a blkdev of size S2. Jeff