From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:09:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4489FFB8.3070203@garzik.org> References: <448992EB.5070405@garzik.org> <4489A7ED.8070007@garzik.org> <20060609195750.GD10524@thunk.org> <20060609203803.GF3574@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> <20060609205036.GI7420@redhat.com> <4489E8EF.5020508@garzik.org> <20060609225604.GK5964@schatzie.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: To: Jeff Garzik , Dave Jones , Theodore Tso , Alex Tomas , Andrew Morton , ext2-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20060609225604.GK5964@schatzie.adilger.int> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: ext2-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Andreas Dilger wrote: > Maybe we should start by deleting ext2 because it is old and obsolete? > The reality is that we will never merge the forks back once they are made. We _already have_ a relevant example: ext2 -> ext3. A useful fork is in the tree, and you're working on it. Jeff