From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2 Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:33:39 -0700 Message-ID: <44C8F8F3.2090606@zytor.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Pekka J Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, tytso@mit.edu, tigran@veritas.com Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([192.83.249.54]:49828 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750929AbWG0ReO (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:34:14 -0400 To: Ulrich Drepper In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Ulrich Drepper wrote: > On 7/27/06, Pekka J Enberg wrote: >> Sure. Though I wonder if sys_frevoke is enough for us and we can drop >> sys_revoke completely. > > No, you want sys_revoke/sys_revokeat. Simplest case: /dev/rst0 vs > /dev/nrst0. You don't want the open rewind the drive. No need to add sys_revoke. -hpa