From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] support >32 bit ext4 filesystem block type in kernel
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:19:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44DB6AB1.3010602@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060809234033.4681017b.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 18:21:00 -0700
> Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Redefine ext4 in-kernel filesystem block type (ext4_fsblk_t) from unsigned
>>long to sector_t, to allow kernel to handle >32 bit ext4 blocks.
>>
>
>
> I don't get it.
The intention is able to support 48bit ext4 on 64bit and 32bit arch
whenevern CONFIG_LBD is enabled (or when sector_t is actually 64 bit).
It just seems waste of memory to support 48bit in-kernel ext4 blks on 32
bit if CONFIG_LBD is disabled, since we won't support large device anyway.
ext3_fsblk_t was a unsigned long type before, which is always 32bit on
32bit arch. Thus we convert the ext3_fsblk_t to sector_t and depend on
CONFIG_LBD to decide whether we need 48bit in-kernel variables.(on-disk
block numbers are always 48 bit).
>
> Randomly-chosen snippet:
>
>
>>@@ -274,7 +274,8 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super
>> freei = percpu_counter_read_positive(&sbi->s_freeinodes_counter);
>> avefreei = freei / ngroups;
>> freeb = percpu_counter_read_positive(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter);
>>- avefreeb = freeb / ngroups;
>>+ avefreeb = freeb;
>>+ sector_div(avefreeb, ngroups);
>> ndirs = percpu_counter_read_positive(&sbi->s_dirs_counter);
>>
>> if ((parent == sb->s_root->d_inode) ||
>
>
> Here, `avefreeb' is still a 32-bit type. Why feed it into sector_div()?
>
avefreeb is ext3_fsblk_t type(sector_t type), which is 64bit on 64bit
arch and 64bit on 32bit arch if CONFIG_LBD is enabled.
>
>>@@ -303,13 +304,15 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super
>> goto fallback;
>> }
>>
>>- blocks_per_dir = (le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count) - freeb) / ndirs;
>>+ blocks_per_dir = le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count) - freeb;
>>+ sector_div(blocks_per_dir, ndirs);
>
>
> And here le32_to_cpu() is very much a 32-bit type. Why sector_div()?
ah, sorry about the confusing, s_blocks_count (the number of blocks on
this fs, on-disk) should be always 48bit value, and should not use
le32_to_cpu() to read-in. That is being fixed in [patch 9/9] 64bit
metadata support, where we convert 32 bit s_blocks_count to sector_t,
and also use mixro EXT4_BLOCKS_COUN(es) to read in the blocks count:
@@ -304,7 +306,7 @@ static int find_group_orlov(struct super
goto fallback;
}
- blocks_per_dir = le32_to_cpu(es->s_blocks_count) - freeb;
+ blocks_per_dir = EXT4_BLOCKS_COUNT(es) - freeb;
This patch[3/9] is just fix the in-kernel blocks type...We trying to do
this incrementally: first, support in-kernel blocks type >32bit, then
change the on-disk blocks type to >32bit.
>
> And I agree with me: we want to get all the sector_t's out of this
> filesystem. unsigned long long, do_div()?
>
Thanks,Mingming
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-10 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-10 1:21 [PATCH 3/9] support >32 bit ext4 filesystem block type in kernel Mingming Cao
2006-08-10 6:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-10 17:19 ` Mingming Cao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44DB6AB1.3010602@us.ibm.com \
--to=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).