From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9]ext4 super block changes for >32 bit blocks numbers
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 10:28:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44DB6CBF.1060706@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060809234105.67414f03.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 18:22:25 -0700
> Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
>>In-kernel and on-disk super block changes to support >32 bit blocks numbers.
>>
>>+static inline u32 EXT4_RELATIVE_ENCODE(ext4_fsblk_t group_base,
>>+ ext4_fsblk_t fs_block)
>>+{
>>+ s32 gdp_block;
>>+
>>+ if (fs_block < (1ULL<<32) && group_base < (1ULL<<32))
>>+ return fs_block;
>>+
>>+ gdp_block = (fs_block - group_base);
>>+ BUG_ON ((group_base + gdp_block) != fs_block);
>>+
>>+ return gdp_block;
>>+}
>>+
>>+static inline ext4_fsblk_t EXT4_RELATIVE_DECODE(ext4_fsblk_t group_base,
>>+ u32 gdp_block)
>>+{
>>+ if (group_base >= (1ULL<<32))
>>+ return group_base + (s32) gdp_block;
>>+
>>+ if ((s32) gdp_block >= 0 && gdp_block < group_base &&
>>+ group_base + gdp_block >= (1ULL<<32))
>>+ return group_base + gdp_block;
>>+
>>+ return gdp_block;
>>+}
>
>
> These seem far too large and far too commonly called to be inlined.
>
>
>>
>>+
>>+#define EXT4_BLOCKS_COUNT(s) \
>>+ (ext4_fsblk_t)(((__u64)le32_to_cpu((s)->s_blocks_count_hi) << 32) | \
>>+ (__u64)le32_to_cpu((s)->s_blocks_count))
>>+#define EXT4_BLOCKS_COUNT_SET(s,v) do { \
>>+ (s)->s_blocks_count = cpu_to_le32((v)); \
>>+ (s)->s_blocks_count_hi = cpu_to_le32(((__u64)(v)) >> 32); \
>>+} while (0)
>>+
>>+#define EXT4_R_BLOCKS_COUNT(s) \
>>+ (ext4_fsblk_t)(((__u64)le32_to_cpu((s)->s_r_blocks_count_hi) << 32) | \
>>+ (__u64)le32_to_cpu((s)->s_r_blocks_count))
>>+#define EXT4_R_BLOCKS_COUNT_SET(s,v) do { \
>>+ (s)->s_r_blocks_count = cpu_to_le32((v)); \
>>+ (s)->s_r_blocks_count_hi = cpu_to_le32(((__u64)(v)) >> 32); \
>>+} while (0)
>>+
>>+#define EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_COUNT(s) \
>>+ (ext4_fsblk_t)(((__u64)le32_to_cpu((s)->s_free_blocks_count_hi) << 32) | \
>>+ (__u64)le32_to_cpu((s)->s_free_blocks_count))
>>+#define EXT4_FREE_BLOCKS_COUNT_SET(s,v) do { \
>>+ (s)->s_free_blocks_count = cpu_to_le32((v)); \
>>+ (s)->s_free_blocks_count_hi = cpu_to_le32(((__u64)(v)) >> 32); \
>>+} while (0)
>
>
> Can these not be implemented as C functions?
>
Okay, I will work with Laurent/Alex to fix this.:)
Mingming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-10 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-10 1:22 [PATCH 9/9]ext4 super block changes for >32 bit blocks numbers Mingming Cao
2006-08-10 6:41 ` Andrew Morton
2006-08-10 17:28 ` Mingming Cao [this message]
2006-08-24 0:28 ` [Ext2-devel] " Avantika Mathur LTC
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44DB6CBF.1060706@us.ibm.com \
--to=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).