From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [RFC] Ext3 online defrag Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:52:20 -0500 Message-ID: <453E28A4.5020107@redhat.com> References: <20061023122710.GA12034@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20061023141641.GA29649@thunk.org> <20061024041433.GB12506@havoc.gtf.org> <20061024135928.GB11034@melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Garzik , Alex Tomas , Theodore Tso , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:54404 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932435AbWJXOyQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:54:16 -0400 To: David Chinner In-Reply-To: <20061024135928.GB11034@melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org David Chinner wrote: > The allocation interface, OTOH, is anything but simple and is really > a filesystem specific interface. Seems logical to me to separate > the two. And ext[234] preallocation would be a very nice feature in its own right. -Eric