From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wendy Cheng Subject: Re: [PATCH] prune_icache_sb Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 01:02:01 -0500 Message-ID: <456D2259.1050306@redhat.com> References: <4564C28B.30604@redhat.com> <20061122153603.33c2c24d.akpm@osdl.org> <456B7A5A.1070202@redhat.com> <20061127165239.9616cbc9.akpm@osdl.org> <456CACF3.7030200@redhat.com> <20061128162144.8051998a.akpm@osdl.org> Reply-To: wcheng@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:62184 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934190AbWK2Fyo (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2006 00:54:44 -0500 To: Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20061128162144.8051998a.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: >We shouldn't export this particular implementation to modules because it >has bad failure modes. There might be a case for exposing an >i_sb_list-based API or, perhaps better, a max-unused-inodes mount option. > > > > Ok, thanks for looking into this - it is appreciated. I'll try to figure out something else. -- Wendy