From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: Brad Boyer <flar@allandria.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ensure i_ino uniqueness in filesystems without permanent inode numbers (via idr)
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 21:56:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45723CDB.1060304@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061202053013.GC26389@cynthia.pants.nu>
Brad Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:21:36PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> Here's an updated (but untested) patch based on your suggestions. I also went
>> ahead and made the exported symbols GPL-only since that seems like it would be
>> appropriate here. Any further thoughts on it?
>
> This seems like exactly the sort of thing that should be a generic
> service available to all filesystem implementors whether it's GPL or
> not. The usual justification for GPL-only is that it's something
> random modules shouldn't be touching anyway, but it's something that
> some part of the tree which could be a module needs.
My main reasoning for doing this was that the structures involved are
per-superblock. There is virtually no reason that a filesystem would
ever need to touch these structures in another filesystem.
So, this is essentially a service to make it easy for filesystems to
implement i_ino uniqueness. I'm not terribly interested in making things
easier for proprietary filesystems, so I don't see a real reason to make
this available to them. They can always implement their own scheme to do
this.
I'm certainly open to discussion though. Is there a compelling reason to
open this up to proprietary software authors?
-- Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-03 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-01 14:48 [RFC][PATCH] ensure i_ino uniqueness in filesystems without permanent inode numbers (via idr) Jeff Layton
2006-12-01 16:52 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-01 17:21 ` Jeff Layton
2006-12-01 17:42 ` Randy Dunlap
2006-12-02 5:30 ` Brad Boyer
2006-12-03 2:56 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2006-12-02 12:58 ` Brad Boyer
2006-12-03 11:52 ` Al Boldi
2006-12-03 12:49 ` Jeff Layton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-11-14 20:22 Jeff Layton
2006-11-14 20:26 ` Al Viro
2006-11-15 16:42 ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-15 16:44 ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-16 14:06 ` Al Viro
2006-11-16 14:34 ` Jeff Layton
2006-11-15 17:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-11-15 17:56 ` Jörn Engel
2006-11-15 20:36 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45723CDB.1060304@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=flar@allandria.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).