From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Delete JFFS (version 1) Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:20:51 -0500 Message-ID: <457EE4F3.6000001@garzik.org> References: <457EA2FE.3050206@garzik.org> <625fc13d0612120456p1d74663fp21e40ee84a8819bc@mail.gmail.com> <457EA86B.5010407@garzik.org> <20061212170125.GA19592@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:57174 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932244AbWLLRUz (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:20:55 -0500 To: Jeff Garzik , Josh Boyer , Linux Kernel , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , jffs-dev@axis.com, David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20061212170125.GA19592@nostromo.devel.redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jeff Garzik (jeff@garzik.org) said: >> It's always been the case that we remove Linux kernel code when the >> number of users (and more importantly, developers) drops to near-nil. > > So, drivers/net/3c501.c? Depends on how motivated Alan remains ;-) Historically, if the developer is active, we have occasionally ignored the miniscule userbase. Jeff