From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shaya Potter Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/24] Unionfs: Documentation Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:24:57 -0500 Message-ID: <45A54B99.9030805@cs.columbia.edu> References: <200701102015.l0AKFOQu028764@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Kara , Andrew Morton , "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, torvalds@osdl.org, mhalcrow@us.ibm.com, David Quigley Return-path: Received: from cs.columbia.edu ([128.59.16.20]:59355 "EHLO cs.columbia.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965087AbXAJU2e (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:28:34 -0500 To: Erez Zadok In-Reply-To: <200701102015.l0AKFOQu028764@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Erez Zadok wrote: > I didn't know about those patches, but yes, they do sound useful. I'm > curious who needed such functionality before and why. If someone can point > me to those patches, we can look into using them for Unionfs. Thanks. I asked for it years ago, You can probably guess why :) see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=105419650921086&w=2 just had too many other things to do then follow the roadmap Al gave.