From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Reiser4. BEST FILESYSTEM EVER. Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 05:58:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4618BCAD.5000202@garzik.org> References: <46157B5B.5000602@gmail.com> <1175817921.18400.1183285196@webmail.messagingengine.com> <461592FB.5060507@zytor.com> <1175819681.20754.1183287946@webmail.messagingengine.com> <461596DE.2020802@zytor.com> <1175823288.25662.1183293506@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4615C780.5040407@zytor.com> <1175833931.8916.1183307802@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20070407191715.GG3510@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <46186A5B.7010309@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: "David H. Lynch Jr" Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:47510 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750893AbXDHJ6J (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Apr 2007 05:58:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46186A5B.7010309@comcast.net> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org David H. Lynch Jr wrote: > I do care about getting Reiser4 into the kernel so that it can > actually get a real test, > and frankly do not see any compelling reason that should not happen. If the compelling reason is that it needs a test, I'd say its not ready. Jeff