public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David H. Lynch Jr" <dhlii@comcast.net>
To: johnrobertbanks@fastmail.fm, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Reiser4. BEST FILESYSTEM EVER - Christer Weinigel
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2007 23:16:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4619B002.2080601@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1176069053.31062.1183584012@webmail.messagingengine.com>

johnrobertbanks@fastmail.fm wrote:
> Christer Weinigel: Until YOU, have actually used the REISER4 filesystem
> yourself, I think YOU OWE IT to the people on the linux-kernel mailing
> list, to, AS YOU SAY, shut the fuck up. 
>
> Even reading up on the REISER4 filesystem would help. 
>
> Applying a little intelligence would undoubtedly help too.
>   
    John;
       I would like to see Reiser4 get into the Kernel too. But angry
rhetoric ... is not going to do it.
       If it was enough Hans did a much better job of insulting the
naysayers without resulting to vulgarity,
       And it got him pretty much nowhere.

       It is my personal oppinion that the reason Reiser4 did not reach
the kernel long ago
       was because Hans pissed all over way to many people.
   
       Making this about people will serve no one. We can all call each
other assholes, go home feeling vindicated,
       but Reiser4 will be no closer to the kernel, and any potential
that anyone might have benefited from that will just be
       pissed away.

    After that the statistics you are reporting are not TOTALLY meaningless.
    But they are also not compelling.

    It is not wise to be arguing benchmarks anyway.
    I hope that few on this list are not willing to conceed that Reiser4
is fast.
    Whether it is 10% slower than the best or 3 times as fast is
probably not relevant to whether it gets included.

    All the worst case scenarious of Reiser4 performance and behavior
should all still be sufficient to justify
    letting it in as Experimental.

    You can argue your benchmarks forever.
    Your benchmark has narrow applicability - pretty much every
benchmark will.
    And all you do is provoke a firestorm of debate over whether
compressing zeros means anything,
    whether compression is even a good idea, whether, ......
    The answer to ALL of these questions will be "it depends"
   
    I have dealt with huge data sets that were mostly zero's, a file
system that had a factor of 3 space savings and or performance benefit
     might have mattered alot there - but they are not the norm.
    I have dealt with instances where compression increased performance
rather than decreased it.
    Every "feature" of Reiser4 is an asset in some environments and a
liability in others.
    Whether it is suitable for most environments is nto going to be
established by a benchmark.

   
   
   
   

-- 
Dave Lynch 					  	    DLA Systems
Software Development:  				         Embedded Linux
717.627.3770 	       dhlii@dlasys.net 	  http://www.dlasys.net
fax: 1.253.369.9244 			           Cell: 1.717.587.7774
Over 25 years' experience in platforms, languages, and technologies too numerous to list.

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."
Albert Einstein


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-04-09  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <46157B5B.5000602@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <1175817921.18400.1183285196@webmail.messagingengine.com>
     [not found]   ` <461592FB.5060507@zytor.com>
     [not found]     ` <1175819681.20754.1183287946@webmail.messagingengine.com>
     [not found]       ` <461596DE.2020802@zytor.com>
     [not found]         ` <1175823288.25662.1183293506@webmail.messagingengine.com>
     [not found]           ` <4615C780.5040407@zytor.com>
2007-04-06  4:32             ` Reiser4. BEST FILESYSTEM EVER johnrobertbanks
     [not found]               ` <20070406152119.GC4228@delft.aura.cs.cmu.edu>
2007-04-07  2:47                 ` johnrobertbanks
2007-04-07  3:30                   ` Jan Harkes
2007-04-07  5:58                     ` johnrobertbanks
2007-04-07  7:15                       ` Willy Tarreau
2007-04-07 13:47                         ` johnrobertbanks
2007-04-07 14:11                       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-04-07 15:07                         ` johnrobertbanks
2007-04-07 16:05                           ` Pekka Enberg
2007-04-07 17:10                         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-04-08 16:31                           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-04-07 17:21                         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-04-08  0:41                           ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-04-07 17:39                   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-04-08  4:32                     ` David H. Lynch Jr
2007-04-07 19:17               ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-04-08  0:44                 ` johnrobertbanks
2007-04-08  1:27                   ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-04-08  2:56                   ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-08  4:13                     ` johnrobertbanks
2007-04-08 12:48                       ` Jose Celestino
2007-04-08 13:21                         ` johnrobertbanks
2007-04-08 14:14                           ` Willy Tarreau
2007-04-08 17:03                       ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-08 18:18                         ` Jeff Mahoney
2007-04-08  4:32                   ` Christer Weinigel
2007-04-08 21:50                     ` Reiser4. BEST FILESYSTEM EVER - Christer Weinigel johnrobertbanks
2007-04-08 22:58                       ` Richard Knutsson
2007-04-09  5:14                         ` johnrobertbanks
2007-04-09  7:07                           ` Willy Tarreau
2007-04-09 16:10                           ` Richard Knutsson
2007-04-09  1:24                       ` Christer Weinigel
2007-04-09  3:38                         ` David H. Lynch Jr
2007-04-09  3:16                       ` David H. Lynch Jr [this message]
2007-04-09  4:25                         ` johnrobertbanks
2007-04-09 18:35                     ` Reiser4. BEST FILESYSTEM EVER Nate Diller
2007-04-08  4:06                 ` David H. Lynch Jr
2007-04-08  9:58                   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-09  2:52                     ` David H. Lynch Jr
2007-04-09  3:14                       ` Jeff Garzik
2007-04-09  4:40                         ` David H. Lynch Jr
2007-04-09  4:58                           ` Jeff Garzik
     [not found]   ` <1175909205.905.1183425104@webmail.messagingengine.com>
2007-04-07  7:45     ` COMPILING AND CONFIGURING A NEW KERNEL johnrobertbanks
2007-04-07 16:57       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-04-08  1:11         ` johnrobertbanks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4619B002.2080601@comcast.net \
    --to=dhlii@comcast.net \
    --cc=johnrobertbanks@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox