From: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]loop cleanup in fs/namespace.c - repost
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:54:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47448D0A.1040405@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <474481B9.9000603@oracle.com>
Zach Brown пишет:
>> The patch given below replaces the goto-loop by a while-based one.
>
> That certainly looks fine. I would also replace the 'return' with
> 'break', but I guess that's more of a question of personal preference.
>
>> Besides, it removes the export for the same routine, because there are
>> no users for it outside of the core VFS code.
>
> This doesn't look fine. Did you test this?
Oops, my fault. Of course, I tested the patch, but kernel modules are disabled in my test setup, so I missed the error. Thanks for pointing that out, Zach.
Enclosed to this message is a new patch, which replaces the goto-loop by the while-based one, but leaves the EXPORT_SYMBOL macro intact.
And yes, I agree that for this routine, the break statement looks more appropriate than return.
>
> mntput_no_expire() is called from mntput() which is an inline function
> in mount.h. So lots of callers of mntput() in modules will end up
> trying to call mntput_no_expire() from modules.
>
> $ nm fs/fuse/fuse.ko | grep mntput_no_expire
> U mntput_no_expire
>
> - z
>
Signed-off-by Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c
index 0608388..410e766 100644
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -278,19 +278,17 @@ static inline void __mntput(struct vfsmo
void mntput_no_expire(struct vfsmount *mnt)
{
-repeat:
- if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) {
+ while (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) {
if (likely(!mnt->mnt_pinned)) {
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
__mntput(mnt);
- return;
+ break;
}
atomic_add(mnt->mnt_pinned + 1, &mnt->mnt_count);
mnt->mnt_pinned = 0;
spin_unlock(&vfsmount_lock);
acct_auto_close_mnt(mnt);
security_sb_umount_close(mnt);
- goto repeat;
}
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-21 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-21 17:57 [PATCH]loop cleanup in fs/namespace.c - repost Dmitri Vorobiev
2007-11-21 19:06 ` Zach Brown
2007-11-21 19:54 ` Dmitri Vorobiev [this message]
2007-11-21 20:46 ` Zach Brown
2007-11-21 22:49 ` [PATCH] [2.6.24-rc3-mm1] loop " Dmitri Vorobiev
2007-11-21 23:24 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-21 23:47 ` Dmitri Vorobiev
2007-11-26 10:30 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47448D0A.1040405@gmail.com \
--to=dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zach.brown@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).