From: Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] fanotify,audit: deliver fan_info as a hex-encoded string
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 17:15:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4748539.GXAFRqVoOG@x2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvRoNSL0snBY87/b@madcap2.tricolour.ca>
Hello Richard,
On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 10:23:49 PM EDT Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > I compiled a new kernel and run old user space on this. The above event
> > is
> > exactly what I see in my audit logs. Why the fan_info=3F? I really would
> > have expected 0. What if the actual rule number was 63? I think this
> > will work better to leave everything 0 with old user space.
>
> Well, if it is to be consistently hex encoded, that corresponds to "?"
I suppose this OK.
> if it is to be interpreted as a string. Since the fan_type is 0,
> fan_info would be invalid, so a value of 0 would be entirely reasonable,
> hex encoded to fan_info=00. It could also be hex encoded to the string
> "(none)". If you wanted "0" for fan_type=FAN_RESPONSE_INFO_AUDIT_RULE,
> that would be fan_info=30 if it were interpreted as a string, or
> arguably 3F for an integer of rule (decimal) 63. Ultimately, fan_type
> should determine how fan_info's hex encoded value should be interpreted.
>
> But ultimately, the point of this patch is to hex encode the fan_info
> field value.
Just one last update, I have been able to test the patches with the user
space application and it appears to be working from the PoV of what is sent
is what's in the audit logs. I'm not sure how picky old kernels are wrt the
size of what's sent. But an unpatched 5.19 kernel seems to accept the larger
size response and do the right thing.
-Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-09 17:22 [PATCH v4 0/4] fanotify: Allow user space to pass back additional audit info Richard Guy Briggs
2022-08-09 17:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] fanotify: Ensure consistent variable type for response Richard Guy Briggs
2022-08-09 17:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] fanotify: define struct members to hold response decision context Richard Guy Briggs
2022-08-10 6:22 ` Amir Goldstein
2022-08-19 11:24 ` Jan Kara
2022-08-10 14:28 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-19 16:25 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2022-08-19 17:17 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-08-19 21:45 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2022-08-12 0:23 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2022-08-19 11:16 ` Jan Kara
2022-08-19 11:13 ` Jan Kara
2022-08-09 17:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] fanotify,audit: Allow audit to use the full permission event response Richard Guy Briggs
2022-08-10 20:32 ` kernel test robot
2022-08-16 0:22 ` Paul Moore
2022-08-31 21:07 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2022-08-31 21:25 ` Steve Grubb
2022-08-31 22:19 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2022-08-31 23:55 ` Steve Grubb
2022-09-01 1:47 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-01 7:51 ` Jan Kara
2022-09-01 18:31 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-07 18:43 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2022-09-07 20:11 ` Steve Grubb
2022-09-07 20:23 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-08 21:14 ` Steve Grubb
2022-09-08 21:22 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-09 2:20 ` Steve Grubb
2022-09-09 2:41 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2022-09-09 3:25 ` Paul Moore
2022-09-09 4:03 ` Steve Grubb
2022-09-09 11:09 ` Jan Kara
2022-09-09 14:22 ` Steve Grubb
2022-09-09 14:38 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2022-09-09 14:55 ` Steve Grubb
2022-09-09 18:50 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2022-08-09 17:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] fanotify,audit: deliver fan_info as a hex-encoded string Richard Guy Briggs
2022-08-10 19:15 ` Steve Grubb
2022-08-11 2:23 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2022-08-15 21:15 ` Steve Grubb [this message]
2022-08-16 0:31 ` Paul Moore
2022-08-16 13:37 ` Steve Grubb
2022-08-19 21:42 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2022-08-10 5:21 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] fanotify: Allow user space to pass back additional audit info Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4748539.GXAFRqVoOG@x2 \
--to=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).