From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@redhat.com>,
Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] nfsd/blocklayout: always ignore loca_time_modify
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 13:09:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47bf9653ce304f973cef6248e10a7dba4d958140.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331153406.4049290-2-hch@lst.de>
On Tue, 2026-03-31 at 17:33 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> RFC 8881 Section 18.42 makes it clear that the client provided timestamp
> is a "may" condition, and clients that want to force a specific timestamp
> should send a separate SETATTR in the compound.
>
> Since commit b82f92d5dd1a ("fs: have setattr_copy handle multigrain
> timestamps appropriately") the ia_mtime value is ignored by file
> systems using multi-grain timestamps like XFS, which is the only
> file system supporting blocklayout exports right now, so make that
> explicit in NFSD as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c b/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
> index a7cfba29990e..5ee5735b39bb 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/blocklayout.c
> @@ -179,15 +179,20 @@ static __be32
> nfsd4_block_commit_blocks(struct inode *inode, struct nfsd4_layoutcommit *lcp,
> struct iomap *iomaps, int nr_iomaps)
> {
> - struct timespec64 mtime = inode_get_mtime(inode);
> struct iattr iattr = { .ia_valid = 0 };
> int error;
>
> - if (lcp->lc_mtime.tv_nsec == UTIME_NOW ||
> - timespec64_compare(&lcp->lc_mtime, &mtime) < 0)
> - lcp->lc_mtime = current_time(inode);
> + /*
> + * This ignores the client provided mtime in loca_time_modify, as a
> + * fully client specified mtime doesn't really fit into the Linux
> + * multi-grain timestamp architecture.
> + *
> + * RFC 8881 Section 18.42 makes it clear that the client provided
> + * timestamp is a "may" condition, and clients that want to force a
> + * specific timestamp should send a separate SETATTR in the compound.
> + */
> iattr.ia_valid |= ATTR_ATIME | ATTR_CTIME | ATTR_MTIME;
> - iattr.ia_atime = iattr.ia_ctime = iattr.ia_mtime = lcp->lc_mtime;
> + iattr.ia_atime = iattr.ia_ctime = iattr.ia_mtime = current_time(inode);
Technically, these fields are completely ignored by notify_change,
unless their counterpart ATTR_?TIME_SET flag is set, so you could just
leave them unset.
>
> if (lcp->lc_size_chg) {
> iattr.ia_valid |= ATTR_SIZE;
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-31 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-31 15:33 cleanup block-style layouts exports Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] nfsd/blocklayout: always ignore loca_time_modify Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 17:09 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2026-04-01 14:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] exportfs: split out the ops for layout-based block device access Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 17:24 ` Jeff Layton
2026-04-01 14:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 18:07 ` Chuck Lever
2026-04-01 6:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] exportfs: don't pass struct iattr to ->commit_blocks Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 17:26 ` Jeff Layton
2026-03-31 17:30 ` Chuck Lever
2026-03-31 17:33 ` Jeff Layton
2026-04-01 6:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 15:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] exportfs,nfsd: rework checking for layout-based block device access support Christoph Hellwig
2026-03-31 17:52 ` Jeff Layton
2026-03-31 18:00 ` Chuck Lever
2026-03-31 17:33 ` cleanup block-style layouts exports Chuck Lever
2026-04-01 6:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 13:39 ` Chuck Lever
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-01 14:40 cleanup block-style layouts exports v2 Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-01 14:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] nfsd/blocklayout: always ignore loca_time_modify Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47bf9653ce304f973cef6248e10a7dba4d958140.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox