From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>, Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-aio@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: reduce stack usage by shrinking struct kiocb
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:13:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4815F7A2.7060605@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804270617.36629.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Hi Al, Benjamin, David,
>
> struct kiocb is placed on stack by, for example, do_sync_write().
> Eventually it contributes to xfs writeout path's stack usage, among others.
> This is *the* path which causes 4k stack overflows on i386 with xfs.
>
> This patch trivially reorders fields of this structure,
> and makes some of them smaller.
Great, thanks for doing this. I see one fatal bug, though. Can you fix
it up and resubmit?
- unsigned long ki_flags;
+ unsigned short ki_flags; /* range: 0..2 */
Careful, ki_flags is used by the bitops routines which require an
unsigned long. I'd just leave ki_flags as is.
> ki_nr_segs: ulong -> uint: nobody uses 4 billion element writev's
> (and it would not work anyway)
Indeed. Maybe explicitly mention that it's safe 'cause we pass
ki_nbytes to rw_copy_check_uvector() for comparison against UIO_MAXIOV
before we store it in the kiocb.
+ /*unsigned short ki_opcode; - moved up for denser packing */
Don't bother commenting out fields that are moved, just move 'em.
Otherwise it looks great, thanks.
- z
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-28 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-27 4:17 [PATCH] vfs: reduce stack usage by shrinking struct kiocb Denys Vlasenko
2008-04-28 16:13 ` Zach Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4815F7A2.7060605@oracle.com \
--to=zach.brown@oracle.com \
--cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).