From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Newall Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Union Mount: glibc readdir support Date: Tue, 06 May 2008 22:40:28 +0930 Message-ID: <482058C4.8010104@davidnewall.com> References: <20080429133201.GA9938@localhost.localdomain> <20080429133346.GB9938@localhost.localdomain> <48195E69.3030701@redhat.com> <20080506042117.GA29298@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ulrich Drepper , bsn.0007@gmail.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Jan Blunck , Erez Zadok , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, Christoph Hellwig , Mingming Cao , Dave Hansen , Trond Myklebust , David Woodhouse To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080506042117.GA29298@in.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Bharata B Rao wrote: > Is dis-allowing NFS-exporting of unions an option ? Is it that simple? What about a union further in an NFS export? What about union-mounting after the tree has been NFS-exported? If the kernel won't fully merge unions then FS servers have to do whatever it is that's being proposed for glibc.