From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ric Wheeler Subject: Re: [RFC] 'discard sectors' block request. Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 10:21:39 -0400 Message-ID: <489861F3.5070508@gmail.com> References: <488B7281.4020007@gmail.com> <20080726130200.f541e604.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1217900716.3454.667.camel@pmac.infradead.org> <20080805114210.GW20055@kernel.dk> <1217943136.3454.730.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jens Axboe , Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, gilad@codefidence.com To: David Woodhouse Return-path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.244]:2707 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755486AbYHEOVu (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Aug 2008 10:21:50 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so418040and.103 for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 07:21:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1217943136.3454.730.camel@pmac.infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I think that this is a very interesting patch. Just for background, NetApp has proposed some extensions for a similar SCSI mechanism aimed more at large arrays which want to do "thin provisioned LUNS": 08-149R0 2008/03/11 SBC - Thin Provisioning http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/document.08/08-149r0.pdf 08-070R0 2008/01/14 Thin Provisioning Concept Proposal http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/document.08/08-070r0.pdf ric