From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Phillip Lougher <phillip@lougher.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Sending patches, against linux-next.git, linux-2.6.git or what?
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 05:33:52 +0100
Message-ID: <48FEAD30.3090906@lougher.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.86]:3009 "EHLO
	anchor-post-36.mail.demon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750866AbYJVEdj (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:33:39 -0400
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Hi,

I'm about to send another respin of the Squashfs patches.  Do I base 
them against linux-next.git, linux-2.6.git or what?  I thought they 
should be against linux-next, but I've already got one complaint.  So, 
I'm confused, what tree should new patches be based off?

Any advice would be useful.

Thanks

Phillip