linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jim owens <jowens-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Ric Wheeler <ricwheeler-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Jamie Lokier <jamie-yetKDKU6eevNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
	xfs-VZNHf3L845pBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
	linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] writeback data integrity and other fixes (take 3)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:51:44 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4909ADE0.1060205@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081030021601.GF18041-B4tOwbsTzaBolqkO4TVVkw@public.gmane.org>

Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:56:36AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 09:32 -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>>> Jamie Lokier wrote:
>>>>> Is there anything that particularly makes it a file operation
>>>>> as opposed to an inode operation?
>>>>>     
>>>> In principle, is fsync() required to flush all dirty data written
>>>> through any file descriptor ever, or just dirty data written through
>>>> the file descriptor used for fsync()?
>>>>
>>>> -- Jamie
>>>> --
>>>>   
>>> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/fsync.html
>>>
>>> Is a pointer to what seems to be the official posix spec for this - it 
>>> is definitely per file descriptor, not per file system, etc...
>>>
>> Maybe I'm reading Jamie's question wrong, but I think he's saying:
>>
>> /* open exactly the same file twice */
>> fd = open("file");
>> fd2 = open("file");
>>
>> write(fd, "stuff")
>> write(fd2, "more stuff")
>> fsync(fd);
>>
>> Does the fsync promise "more stuff" will be on disk?  I think the answer
>> should be yes.
> 
> I think so. And this is in the context of making ->fsync an inode
> operation and avoid the NFS NULL-file problem... I don't think there
> is any fd specific metadata that fsync has to deal with? Any other
> reasons it has to be a file operation?

NO, or at least *not the posix definition*.  It is normal
in unix-like operating systems to always flush everything
dirty on the inode no matter what stream it arrived on.

Flushing everything is permitted but not the requirement so
applications must not expect this is *promised* or they
will not be portable.  It is only guaranteed that "stuff"
in this example will be on disk.

AFAIK the fsync semantic comes from the days of dinosaurs,
mainframes, and minicomputers... when a lot of operating
systems had user-space libraries that buffered the I/O.
On fsync(fd), the "fd2" data would still be in user-space.

jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-10-30 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-28 14:47 [patch 0/9] writeback data integrity and other fixes (take 3) npiggin
2008-10-28 14:47 ` [patch 1/9] mm: write_cache_pages cyclic fix npiggin
2008-10-29  0:24   ` [patch 1.1/9] mm: write_cache_pages cyclic fix fix Nick Piggin
2008-10-28 14:47 ` [patch 2/9] mm: write_cache_pages early loop termination npiggin
2008-10-28 14:47 ` [patch 3/9] mm: write_cache_pages writepage error fix npiggin
2008-10-28 14:47 ` [patch 4/9] mm: write_cache_pages integrity fix npiggin
2008-10-28 14:47 ` [patch 5/9] mm: write_cache_pages cleanups npiggin
2008-10-28 14:47 ` [patch 6/9] mm: write_cache_pages optimise page cleaning npiggin
2008-10-28 14:47 ` [patch 7/9] mm: write_cache_pages terminate quickly npiggin
2008-10-30 23:07   ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-31  7:29     ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-28 14:47 ` [patch 8/9] mm: write_cache_pages more " npiggin
2008-10-28 14:47 ` [patch 9/9] mm: do_sync_mapping_range integrity fix npiggin
2008-10-30 23:13   ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-31  9:16     ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-31 10:04       ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-31 10:53         ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-31 20:03         ` Jamie Lokier
2008-10-31 14:10       ` Chris Mason
2008-10-31 14:30         ` steve
2008-10-31 15:02           ` Chris Mason
2008-11-01  8:04         ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-28 15:39 ` [patch 0/9] writeback data integrity and other fixes (take 3) Nick Piggin
2008-10-28 22:27   ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-29  0:04     ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-29  0:16     ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-29  3:16       ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-29  3:26         ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-29  4:11           ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-29  4:57             ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-29  5:06               ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-29  9:13           ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-29 21:42             ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-29 21:45               ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-29 21:53                 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-29  4:00         ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-29  5:27           ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-29  9:12         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-29  9:21           ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-29  9:44             ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-10-29 10:30               ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-29 12:22                 ` Jamie Lokier
     [not found]                   ` <20081029122234.GE846-yetKDKU6eevNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-29 13:32                     ` Ric Wheeler
2008-10-29 14:56                       ` Chris Mason
     [not found]                         ` <1225292196.6448.263.camel-cGoWVVl3WGUrkklhUoBCrlaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-30  2:16                           ` Nick Piggin
     [not found]                             ` <20081030021601.GF18041-B4tOwbsTzaBolqkO4TVVkw@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-30 12:51                               ` jim owens [this message]
2008-10-30 13:41                                 ` Jim Rees
2008-10-29 21:43                   ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-29  8:51     ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-28 23:14 ` Dave Chinner
2008-10-28 23:57   ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-29  0:05     ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-29  0:10       ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4909ADE0.1060205@hp.com \
    --to=jowens-vxdhtt5mjny@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=chris.mason-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jamie-yetKDKU6eevNLxjTenLetw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ricwheeler-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=xfs-VZNHf3L845pBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).