linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: linux-next: xfs tree build failure
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:05:14 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4918E85A.5000701@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081107160611.d6f64fdd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:27:53 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 07:47:54AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>>>> I think it's probably the only solution - we need to wait until
>>>>> the I_LOCK bit is cleared from the inode and AFAICT wait_on_inode()
>>>>> is the only way to do it.
>>>> Any resolution?
>>> I was waiting on a comment from Christoph. I'll cc him directly this
>>> time ;)
>> What comment do you expect from me?  The fix looks correct, but at some
>> point you should probably run all these exports past Al to get another
>> review.  Especially as he's doing major work in this area currently.
> 
> OK, I have dropped the xfs tree for today.  Let me know when it is sorted
> out.

Okay, your fix is in and it is building again.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-11  2:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-30  2:23 linux-next: xfs tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2008-10-30  9:08 ` Dave Chinner
2008-11-05  2:20   ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-05 20:47     ` Dave Chinner
2008-11-06 15:27       ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-11-07  5:06         ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-11-11  2:05           ` Lachlan McIlroy [this message]
2008-11-11  2:11             ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4918E85A.5000701@sgi.com \
    --to=lachlan@sgi.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).