From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Justin P. Mattock" Subject: Re: Tux3 report: A Golden Copy Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 17:32:48 -0800 Message-ID: <495EC040.2070905@gmail.com> References: <200812301935.49303.phillips@phunq.net> <200901021445.37062.phillips@phunq.net> <495E9F22.3080206@gmail.com> <200901021719.26680.phillips@phunq.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: tux3@tux3.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Phillips Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200901021719.26680.phillips@phunq.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: tux3-bounces@tux3.org Errors-To: tux3-bounces@tux3.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Friday 02 January 2009 15:11, Justin P. Mattock wrote: > >> The game that came to mind when I first >> heard of tux3(I had to google a bit to find the name) >> was tux racer. :^) >> quick question: >> what is the state for security file labeling for >> SELinux on this filesystem? >> > > There is a lot of interest in security labels. You are not the first > to ask. > > Tux3 variable inode attributes are ideal for implementing security > labels efficiently, way more lightweight than extended attributes. > Otherwise, we would like to know exactly what people want. > > Regards, > > Daniel > > > thats probably one of the main areas of interest that I have in filesystems, the ability to run a policy etc.. As for what people want, thats tough to say, my guess would be file corruption, then probably security etc.. regards; Justin P. Mattock