From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] compiling on 2.6.28 broken? Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:35:46 -0600 Message-ID: <496E5AB2.7040507@sandeen.net> References: <20090112190420.51f75853@pedra.chehab.org> <20090112132130.6c932b85.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090112220624.4fbfee34@pedra.chehab.org> <20090112162337.318dd61d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090113184755.87720@gmx.net> <20090113105947.9e774b69.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090113191757.74290@gmx.net> <20090113113700.776a94b5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090113203843.GJ29283@parisc-linux.org> <1231957750.8269.28.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <496E56EB.2030301@gmx.de> <1231968240.8269.48.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: wk , Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , rjw@sisk.pl, HWerner4@gmx.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@infradead.org To: Chris Mason Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:33718 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760339AbZANVgz (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:36:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1231968240.8269.48.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Chris Mason wrote: > On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 22:19 +0100, wk wrote: ... >> I cannot fully understand what strace -v outputs (see attachment), but >> what i see is that 'find' stops after finding a file with d_off = 4294967295 >> 4294967295 = 0xFFFFFFFF, adding any number greater that zero will be >> greater that 32bits, so this could be the reason for the message "value >> too large". >> >> >> >> I also noticed that i cannot access these files through samba if i boot >> from 2.6.28 - really strange. >> If i reboot older kernels these are visible in samba again and fully >> accessible. >> >> Attached the log from stracing the command which was ivoked by the >> Makefile from v4l-dvb. >> I guess this is all i could contribute to that problem. Thats stuff for >> xfs filesystem experts now.. > > Seems suspect indeed. Could you please attach the strace for the run > that works on the older kernel? Chris got my attention on this one; you probably want this fix from hch: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2009-01/msg00158.html -Eric