From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Waychison Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] Deferred batching of dput() Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:07:13 -0800 Message-ID: <49762EF1.3000001@google.com> References: <20090117022936.20425.43248.stgit@crlf.corp.google.com> <20090117022942.20425.15217.stgit@crlf.corp.google.com> <20090117101501.GA2682@ioremap.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Evgeniy Polyakov Return-path: Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.13]:59055 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755904AbZATUH1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 15:07:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090117101501.GA2682@ioremap.net> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Hi Mike. > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 06:29:42PM -0800, Mike Waychison (mikew@google.com) wrote: >> +static void postpone_dput(struct dentry *dentry) >> +{ >> + struct postponed_dentries *ppd, *new_ppd; >> + >> +again: >> + ppd = get_cpu_var(postponed_dentries); >> + if (!pending_dput_full(ppd)) { >> + add_pending_dput(ppd, dentry); >> + put_cpu_var(postponed_dentries); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + /* need to flush out existing pending dentries. */ >> + put_cpu_var(postponed_dentries); >> + /* Allocate more space.. */ >> + new_ppd = new_postponed_dentries(); >> + if (!new_ppd) { >> + /* Take the slow path, memory is low */ >> + struct postponed_dentries_onstack ppd_onstack; >> + struct postponed_dentries *ppd; >> + >> + ppd = init_ppd_onstack(&ppd_onstack); >> + add_pending_dput(ppd, dentry); >> + process_postponed_dentries(ppd); >> + return; >> + } > > Why don't you want just to put the dentry in the lowmem condition? > You're right. This path could just use the original dput path. I'll fix it up in the next version.