From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomas M Subject: New filesystem for Linux kernel Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 09:13:08 +0100 Message-ID: <49A3AC14.2050107@slax.org> References: <7558.1235374266@jrobl> <7769.1235374482@jrobl> <49A268A7.1010708@slax.org> <49A26ACC.90804@slax.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from cuda1.bluetone.cz ([212.158.128.5]:35597 "EHLO mail.bluetone.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751111AbZBXIMv (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Feb 2009 03:12:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49A26ACC.90804@slax.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: An overview of aufs2 has been submitted to this list. I noticed zero response at all. Nobody cares? I suggest to remove unionfs from Andrew's -mm tree and replace it by aufs2! Tell me why this should not happen... I write this in the hope that a debate will start... Thank you Tomas M slax.org