From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [osd-dev] [PATCH 1/8] exofs: Kbuild, Headers and osd utils Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:43:26 +0200 Message-ID: <49AA66CE.7080506@panasas.com> References: <49993FF2.9050200@panasas.com> <20090217092042C.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <499A70E7.4000405@panasas.com> <20090227170931Z.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avishay@gmail.com, osd-dev@open-osd.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org To: FUJITA Tomonori Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090227170931Z.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:10:15 +0200 > Boaz Harrosh wrote: > >> FUJITA Tomonori wrote: >>> Can you stop the argument, "exofs is similar to the existing >>> traditional file systems hence it should be treated equally". It's >>> simply untrue. Does anyone except for panasas people insist the same >>> argument? >>> >> No I will not, it is true. exofs is just a regular old filesystem >> nothing different. > > After reading this, I gave up discussing this issue with you but I > still wait for your fixes that you promised: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123445759718253&w=2 > > > Thanks, > -- They are on the way, I have not forgotten Boaz