linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>,
	Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@newdream.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:54:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49CAFC68.5000102@themaw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49CAE3DB.3030909@themaw.net>

Ian Kent wrote:
> Sage Weil wrote:
>> Would it be possible to avoid the upcall in revalidate, and instead fail 
>> and let the subsequent lookup path do it?  (I'm guessing the upcall 
>> doesn't happen for _every_ revalidate?)

snip ...

> 
> It was more than three years ago when I tried to make everything go
> through lookup so my memory is pretty unclear now. In the end I think
> there was one case in real_lookup() where the lookup was skipped,
> revalidate was called and failed but lookup wasn't then called again and
> I got an incorrect failure. AFAICR all other code paths that hold the
> mutex over lookup and revalidate perform the revalidate first and then
> the lookup if that fails, which avoids this case.

I've managed to locate the work that I did on this (on an old machine I
left as it was for posterity).

I haven't had a chance to look at what I did closely and a lot has
changed in autofs4 since. The one thing that I'm fairly sure I would
need to be able to make this work is the order of the calls in
real_lookup() to be revalidate then lookup. Would that work for
real_lookup() given that we hold the mutex now?

In fact this might be an opportunity for me to clean up my sloppy
DCACHE_AUTOFS_PENDING handling by moving it all under the inode mutex.

Since this is likely to be quite a bit of effort on my part could I
impose on you to help me understand the issue you need to resolve? I'd
really like to feel it's worth the effort.

Ian


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-26  3:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-19 20:16 [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfs: clean up real_lookup Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-19 20:35     ` Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-24  4:14 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-24  4:18   ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25  4:29     ` Sage Weil
2009-03-25  6:08       ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 16:11         ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 19:11           ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26  2:09             ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26  3:53               ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26  8:00                 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26 10:38                 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-29  8:53                   ` Ian Kent
2009-04-03  0:58                     ` Sage Weil
2009-04-03  2:00                       ` Ian Kent
2009-04-03  3:07                         ` Sage Weil
2009-06-22 17:15                         ` Sage Weil
2009-06-23  0:37                           ` Ian Kent
2009-06-23  2:40                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25  7:21                               ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25 13:41                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25 13:58                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-23  2:42                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-24  2:28                             ` Ian Kent
2009-06-24  5:45                               ` Sage Weil
2009-06-24  9:17                                 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-24 17:46                                   ` Sage Weil
2009-06-25  2:50                                     ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25  4:13                                     ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25  4:49                                       ` Sage Weil
2009-06-25  5:52                                         ` Ian Kent
2009-09-17  6:36                                           ` Ian Kent
2009-07-20  2:45                                 ` Ian Kent
2009-07-28 22:47                                   ` Sage Weil
2009-07-29  2:59                                     ` Ian Kent
2009-07-29 16:57                                       ` Sage Weil
2009-07-30  0:56                                         ` Ian Kent
2009-07-30 17:47                                           ` Sage Weil
2009-07-31  2:03                                             ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26  3:54               ` Ian Kent [this message]
2009-03-26  4:03                 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26  5:07                 ` Ian Kent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49CAFC68.5000102@themaw.net \
    --to=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sage@newdream.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yehuda@newdream.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).