From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] lockd: fix FILE_LOCKING=n build error
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:22:50 -0700
Message-ID: <49F71F4A.3080908@oracle.com>
References: <20090428165343.2e357d7a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090428165343.2e357d7a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>

lockd/svclock.c is missing a header file <linux/fs.h>.

<linux/fs.h> is missing a definition of locks_release_private()
for the config case of FILE_LOCKING=n, causing a build error:

fs/lockd/svclock.c:330: error: implicit declaration of function 'locks_release_private'

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
---
 fs/lockd/svclock.c |    1 +
 include/linux/fs.h |    4 ++++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

--- linux-next-20090428.orig/fs/lockd/svclock.c
+++ linux-next-20090428/fs/lockd/svclock.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/fs.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/sched.h>
 #include <linux/smp_lock.h>
--- linux-next-20090428.orig/include/linux/fs.h
+++ linux-next-20090428/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1183,6 +1183,10 @@ static inline void locks_remove_flock(st
 	return;
 }
 
+static inline void locks_release_private(struct file_lock *fl)
+{
+}
+
 static inline void posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
 {
 	return;

-- 
~Randy