From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [RFC] fiemap tester Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 10:54:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4A08666A.6020700@oracle.com> References: <20090508191649.GG9068@unused.rdu.redhat.com> <20090508161318.c73d766c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090511094639.GA7488@infradead.org> <20090511171046.GA21518@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Theodore Tso , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Josef Bacik , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, sandeen Return-path: Received: from acsinet11.oracle.com ([141.146.126.233]:40262 "EHLO acsinet11.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752494AbZEKRye (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 13:54:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090511171046.GA21518@mit.edu> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Theodore Tso wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 05:46:39AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Last time I brought the idea of a small in-tree test harness up at KS >> people weren't too fond of it, but if we get more backing now we could >> try it, otherwise we can just stick it into xfsqa which will hopefully >> soon be generalized to a general fs QA suite. > > Two questions --- first of all, has there been any progress with > respect to fixing the licensing of the xfsqa tree. (i.e., "All Rights > Reserved" needs to change to a GPLv2 license)? Given that we are not lawyers: The current kernel tree contains >3500 files that contain the phrase "All Rights Reserved". Are they a problem? -- ~Randy LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/