From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@nokia.com>
To: "hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp" <hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp>
Cc: "dedekind@infradead.org" <dedekind@infradead.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: ubifs, race between link and unlink/rename?
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 21:28:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0B1155.4060906@nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9917.1242232308@jrobl>
hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
> Is there a race condition in ubifs?
Yes, it does look like it. EXT3 and EXT4 explicitly check for nlink == 0
in their link functions. UBIFS seems to have overlooked that check.
I guess some file systems do not have a problem with the race, which is why
VFS allows it. We will patch UBIFS, but I cannot comment about changing
VFS.
Thank you for finding this :-)
> Here is a scenario.
>
> Process A Process B
> ----------------------+---------------------------
> create("dirA/fileA"); |
> unlink("dirA/fileA"); | link("dirA/fileA", "dirB/fileB");
> | unlink("dirB/fileB");
> ----------------------+---------------------------
>
> In link(2), dirA->i_mutex is not held. So unlink("dirA/fileA") can run
> concurrently (after lookup).
> While ubifs acquires ubifs_inode->ui_mutex, it doesn't check i_nlink.
> When unlink("dirA/fileA") wins ui_mutex race and link() loses,
> - ubifs_unlink("dirA/fileA") will call ubifs_jnl_update/ubifs_add_orphan()
> - ubifs_link() will operate the inode with i_nlink == 0 (finally it will
> be 1)
> - ubifs_unlink("dirB/fileB") will call ubifs_add_orphan() again for the
> same inode
> - and it will produce "orphaned twice" error.
> - (ubifs_add_orphan() is called by ubifs_rename/ubifs_jnl_rename() too)
>
> If this scenario is possible, it may happen in every FS.
> To check i_nlink in vfs_link (like this) may be one option, but it might
> be better to check in ubifs since ubifs_add_orphan() is for i_nlink == 0
> and ubifs specific.
>
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index b207821..820c386 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -2409,9 +2409,12 @@ int vfs_link(struct dentry *old_dentry, struct inode *dir, struct dentry *new_de
> if (error)
> return error;
>
> + error = -ENOENT;
> mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> - DQUOT_INIT(dir);
> - error = dir->i_op->link(old_dentry, dir, new_dentry);
> + if (inode->i_nlink) {
> + DQUOT_INIT(dir);
> + error = dir->i_op->link(old_dentry, dir, new_dentry);
> + }
> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> if (!error)
> fsnotify_link(dir, inode, new_dentry);
>
>
> J. R. Okajima
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-13 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-13 16:31 ubifs, race between link and unlink/rename? hooanon05
2009-05-13 18:28 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2009-05-15 8:44 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-05-15 9:35 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-05-19 6:09 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2009-05-19 6:18 ` hooanon05
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0B1155.4060906@nokia.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@nokia.com \
--cc=dedekind@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).