linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@newdream.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:42:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A404132.8020009@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A4023CF.7040203@themaw.net>

Ian Kent wrote:
> 
> Sorry, I haven't had time to do more on this.
> There is also the issue of what to do about removing the autofs module
> and renaming autofs4 to autofs, as this will break the autofs module.
> 
> I did start contacting people I think would want to know about this but
> haven't gone further than an initial mail.
> 
> The other thing is that this patch was originally written quite a while
> ago and, although it appears to work ok, I'm not sure it's quite what we
> need.
> 

For what it's worth, the v2 protocol was only used very very early on,
and the only difference between the v2 and the v3 protocol is that the
v3 protocol supported the expiration ioctl.

There is no reason to believe there are any current users of the v2
protocol, but from the kernel point of view it is a strict subset of the
v3 protocol, so adding support for it is effectively no-op.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-06-23  2:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-19 20:16 [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfs: clean up real_lookup Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:22   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-19 20:35     ` Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-24  4:14 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-24  4:18   ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25  4:29     ` Sage Weil
2009-03-25  6:08       ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 16:11         ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 19:11           ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26  2:09             ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26  3:53               ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26  8:00                 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26 10:38                 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-29  8:53                   ` Ian Kent
2009-04-03  0:58                     ` Sage Weil
2009-04-03  2:00                       ` Ian Kent
2009-04-03  3:07                         ` Sage Weil
2009-06-22 17:15                         ` Sage Weil
2009-06-23  0:37                           ` Ian Kent
2009-06-23  2:40                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25  7:21                               ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25 13:41                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25 13:58                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-23  2:42                             ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2009-06-24  2:28                             ` Ian Kent
2009-06-24  5:45                               ` Sage Weil
2009-06-24  9:17                                 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-24 17:46                                   ` Sage Weil
2009-06-25  2:50                                     ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25  4:13                                     ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25  4:49                                       ` Sage Weil
2009-06-25  5:52                                         ` Ian Kent
2009-09-17  6:36                                           ` Ian Kent
2009-07-20  2:45                                 ` Ian Kent
2009-07-28 22:47                                   ` Sage Weil
2009-07-29  2:59                                     ` Ian Kent
2009-07-29 16:57                                       ` Sage Weil
2009-07-30  0:56                                         ` Ian Kent
2009-07-30 17:47                                           ` Sage Weil
2009-07-31  2:03                                             ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26  3:54               ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26  4:03                 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26  5:07                 ` Ian Kent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A404132.8020009@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raven@themaw.net \
    --cc=sage@newdream.net \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yehuda@newdream.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).