From: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
To: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@newdream.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:13:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A42F976.8020406@themaw.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906241019250.24576@cobra.newdream.net>
Sage Weil wrote:
>
>> There are several cases I need to deal with, apart from path walks
>> initiated by the daemon which don't cause any call backs, and so are
>> largely handled by trivially returning success. The cases are, an
>> expiring dentry that will go away which ->lookup() can't yet handle, an
>> expiring dentry that won't go away which ->lookup() should be able to
>> handle already, and a straight out mount request which ->lookup() should
>> also be able to handle. The tail end of the expire cases can progress
>> concurrently with a mount, which is further complicated by the two cases
>> of going away or not, so it's all a bit tricky.
>
> It sounds to me like revalidate should only return success in the trivial,
> non-blocking case. And the ->lookup() should be able to handle all
> (other) cases. I.e., things should still work correctly (perhaps more
> slowly) without any d_revalidate() at all. (It still looks like the main
> change needed is for lookup to use d_obtain_alias, instead of returning
> NULL unconditionally...)
How so?
I don't understand how d_obtain_alias() can help in this situation.
Can you elaborate please?
Ian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-19 20:16 [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfs: clean up real_lookup Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-19 20:35 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-19 20:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: make real_lookup do dentry revalidation with i_mutex held Christoph Hellwig
2009-03-24 4:14 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-24 4:18 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 4:29 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-25 6:08 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 16:11 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-25 19:11 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26 2:09 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26 3:53 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26 8:00 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26 10:38 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-29 8:53 ` Ian Kent
2009-04-03 0:58 ` Sage Weil
2009-04-03 2:00 ` Ian Kent
2009-04-03 3:07 ` Sage Weil
2009-06-22 17:15 ` Sage Weil
2009-06-23 0:37 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-23 2:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25 7:21 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25 13:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-25 13:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-23 2:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-06-24 2:28 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-24 5:45 ` Sage Weil
2009-06-24 9:17 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-24 17:46 ` Sage Weil
2009-06-25 2:50 ` Ian Kent
2009-06-25 4:13 ` Ian Kent [this message]
2009-06-25 4:49 ` Sage Weil
2009-06-25 5:52 ` Ian Kent
2009-09-17 6:36 ` Ian Kent
2009-07-20 2:45 ` Ian Kent
2009-07-28 22:47 ` Sage Weil
2009-07-29 2:59 ` Ian Kent
2009-07-29 16:57 ` Sage Weil
2009-07-30 0:56 ` Ian Kent
2009-07-30 17:47 ` Sage Weil
2009-07-31 2:03 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26 3:54 ` Ian Kent
2009-03-26 4:03 ` Sage Weil
2009-03-26 5:07 ` Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A42F976.8020406@themaw.net \
--to=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sage@newdream.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yehuda@newdream.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).