From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] writeback: support > 1 flusher thread per bdi
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:11:20 +0300
Message-ID: <4A520608.7070707@gmail.com>
References: <1245926523-21959-1-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com> <1245926523-21959-6-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com> <4A51FE33.3070702@gmail.com> <20090706134930.GA4987@shareable.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, chris.mason@oracle.com,
	david@fromorbit.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	jack@suse.cz, yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com,
	richard@rsk.demon.co.uk, damien.wyart@free.fr, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	Alan.Brunelle@hp.com
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.233]:33999 "EHLO
	mgw-mx06.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756942AbZGFOTg (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 6 Jul 2009 10:19:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20090706134930.GA4987@shareable.org>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> +static void bdi_queue_work(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, struct bd=
i_work=20
>>> *work)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (work) {
>>> +		work->seen =3D bdi->wb_mask;
>>> +		BUG_ON(!work->seen);
>>> +		atomic_set(&work->pending, bdi->wb_cnt);
>>> +		BUG_ON(!bdi->wb_cnt);
>>> +
>>> +		/*
>>> +		 * Make sure stores are seen before it appears on the list
>>> +		 */
>>> +		smp_mb();
>>> +
>>> +		spin_lock(&bdi->wb_lock);
>>> +		list_add_tail_rcu(&work->list, &bdi->work_list);
>>> +		spin_unlock(&bdi->wb_lock);
>>> +	}
>> Doesn't spin_lock() include an implicit memory barrier?
>> After &bdi->wb_lock is acquired, it is guaranteed that all
>> memory operations are finished.
>=20
> I'm pretty sure spin_lock() is an "acquire" barrier, which just guara=
ntees
> loads/stores after the spin_lock() are done after taking the lock.
>=20
> It doesn't guarantee anything about loads/stores before the spin_lock=
().

Right, but comment says memops should be flushed before the
list is changed.

--=20
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=90=D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC =D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=
=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel=
" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html