From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] VFS: introduce helpers for manipulation s_dirty flag
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:32:12 +0300
Message-ID: <4A54BBFC.8010404@gmail.com>
References: <20090707180541.17048.49901.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <20090707180548.17048.74367.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> <4A547050.20606@panasas.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
	format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1755904AbZGHPcw@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A547050.20606@panasas.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> @@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ static void exofs_put_super(struct super_block *=
sb)
>> =20
>>  	lock_kernel();
>> =20
>> -	if (sb->s_dirt)
>> +	if (is_sb_dirty(sb))
>>  		exofs_write_super(sb);
>> =20
>>  	/* make sure there are no pending commands */
> <snip>
>=20
> I have just asked a pull request from Linus with a patch that adds
> one more "if (sb->s_dirt)" call site. So if he pulls it into 2.6.31-r=
c3
> I'll send you a mail and you can update. If not then it will go in at
> 2.6.32, please tel me when this is going into linux-next and through =
which
> tree, and I'll sync with it.

[Sorry for wrong e-mail address]

Sure, thanks, I'll keep this in mind.

--=20
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=90=D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC =D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=
=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9)