From: Milind Dumbare <milind@gslab.com>
To: xfs mailing list <xfs@oss.sgi.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Multi threaded random IO
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:28:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A60442E.7010206@gslab.com> (raw)
Any standard comparison between multi threaded random Write vs multi
threaded random Read on XFS or any other filesystem?
I see multi threaded random Write faster than multi threaded random
Read. Which is contradictory to standard "Reads faster that Writes" law.
My test setup is.
10MB record size, 2TB filesize, 8 threads.iozone
Any comments?
Thanks,
Milind
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2009-07-17 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-17 9:28 Milind Dumbare [this message]
2009-07-17 11:10 ` Multi threaded random IO Emmanuel Florac
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A60442E.7010206@gslab.com \
--to=milind@gslab.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).