linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, esandeen@redhat.com,
	eteo@redhat.com, eparis@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] selinux: ajust rules for ATTR_FORCE
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:56:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A8A50AD.7030004@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87my5yxidt.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>

OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Could you review this? I've added ATTR_TIMES_SET to check explicit
> utimes(), and tried it with minimum change.
>
> [I'm not sure this handles notify_change() usage of nfsd (and perhaps
> other network fs too) correctly, and whether selinux may want to check
> it. I guess network fs _may_ try to change the multiple attributes at a
> time. Well, even if it's true, it would be another topic...]
>
>   

Ah, according to the discussion here, I know I misunderstood 
ATTR_FORCE... sorry.
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
>
>
> From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
>
> As suggested by OGAWA Hirofumi in thread: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/7/132,
> we should let selinux_inode_setattr() to match our ATTR_* rules.
> ATTR_FORCE should not force things like ATTR_SIZE.
>
> Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com>
> [tweaks]
> Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
>   

Great!

Some comments below.

> ---
>
>  security/selinux/hooks.c |   13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN security/selinux/hooks.c~selinux-truncate-fix security/selinux/hooks.c
> --- linux-2.6/security/selinux/hooks.c~selinux-truncate-fix	2009-08-18 03:50:09.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6-hirofumi/security/selinux/hooks.c	2009-08-18 05:35:11.000000000 +0900
> @@ -2711,12 +2711,17 @@ static int selinux_inode_permission(stru
>  static int selinux_inode_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *iattr)
>  {
>  	const struct cred *cred = current_cred();
> +	unsigned int ia_valid = iattr->ia_valid;
>  
> -	if (iattr->ia_valid & ATTR_FORCE)
> -		return 0;
> +	/* ATTR_FORCE is just used for ATTR_KILL_S[UG]ID. */
> +	if (ia_valid & ATTR_FORCE) {
> +		ia_valid &= ~(ATTR_KILL_SUID | ATTR_KILL_SGID | ATTR_MODE);
> +		if (!ia_valid)
> +			return 0;
>   

So if I read this correctly, (ATTR_FORCE| ATTR_KILL_SUID|ATTR_MODE) will 
not return here, since 'ia_valid' will be ATTR_FORCE finally.

I think you forgot to clear ATTR_FORCE here...

> +	}
>  
> -	if (iattr->ia_valid & (ATTR_MODE | ATTR_UID | ATTR_GID |
> -			       ATTR_ATIME_SET | ATTR_MTIME_SET))
> +	if (ia_valid & (ATTR_MODE | ATTR_UID | ATTR_GID |
> +			ATTR_ATIME_SET | ATTR_MTIME_SET | ATTR_TIMES_SET))
>  		return dentry_has_perm(cred, NULL, dentry, FILE__SETATTR);
>  
>  	return dentry_has_perm(cred, NULL, dentry, FILE__WRITE);
> _
>
>   
I am not sure about ATTR_TIMES_SET here, but looks fine. :-/



  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-18  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-17  7:07 [V4 Patch 0/2] fix file truncations when both suid and write permissions set Amerigo Wang
2009-08-17  7:07 ` [Patch 1/2] selinux: ajust rules for ATTR_FORCE Amerigo Wang
2009-08-17  8:46   ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-17 12:15   ` Stephen Smalley
2009-08-17 18:46     ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-17 19:07       ` Stephen Smalley
2009-08-17 19:46         ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-17 19:56           ` Stephen Smalley
2009-08-17 20:11             ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-17 21:03               ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-18  6:56                 ` Amerigo Wang [this message]
2009-08-18  7:39                 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-18  8:46                   ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-18 12:15                   ` Stephen Smalley
2009-08-18 17:26                   ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2009-08-19  2:34                     ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-17  7:07 ` [Patch 2/2] vfs: allow file truncations when both suid and write permissions set Amerigo Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A8A50AD.7030004@redhat.com \
    --to=amwang@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=esandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=eteo@redhat.com \
    --cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).