From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] aio: disable retry
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:15:22 -0700
Message-ID: <4AE61F7A.4080709@oracle.com>
References: <1256243157-16667-1-git-send-email-zach.brown@oracle.com> <1256243157-16667-2-git-send-email-zach.brown@oracle.com> <1256243157-16667-3-git-send-email-zach.brown@oracle.com> <20091025073721.GB6965@infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from rcsinet11.oracle.com ([148.87.113.123]:23378 "EHLO
	rgminet11.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754593AbZJZWPt (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:15:49 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20091025073721.GB6965@infradead.org>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>


> Is there any good reason to keep it?

Not that I know of.

And I think that we'll be pleased with the simplicity of fs/aio.c once
all the retrying code is gone.  We'll see.

- z