From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] sysfs: Propagate renames to the vfs on demand Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:11:56 +0900 Message-ID: <4AF4D76C.6090008@kernel.org> References: <1257249429-12384-12-git-send-email-ebiederm@xmission.com> <20091104214938.GA21033@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kay Sievers , Greg KH , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cornelia Huck , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Benjamin LaHaise , "Eric W. Biederman" To: "Eric W. Biederman" Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:42861 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755072AbZKGCMC (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Nov 2009 21:12:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hello, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > It isn't what I want but it is what the VFS requires. If let the vfs > continue on it's delusional state we will leak the vfs mount and > everything mounted on top of it, with no way to remove the mounts. This is caused by not having any way to prevent deletion on directories with submounts, right? How does other distributed filesystems deal with directories with submounts going away underneath it? Thanks. -- tejun