From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: O_* bit numbers uniqueness check
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:07:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B443695.5090301@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100106065526.GB11368@localhost>
Le 06/01/2010 07:55, Wu Fengguang a écrit :
> The O_* bit numbers are defined in 20+ arch/*, and hence can silently
> overlap. Add a boot time check to ensure the uniqueness as suggested
> by David Miller.
>
> CC: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> CC: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> CC: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> {
> + /* please add new bits here to ensure allocation uniqueness */
> + BUG_ON(20 != hweight32(
> + O_RDONLY | O_WRONLY | O_RDWR |
> + O_CREAT | O_EXCL | O_NOCTTY |
> + O_TRUNC | O_APPEND | O_NONBLOCK |
> + O_SYNC | FASYNC | O_DIRECT |
> + O_LARGEFILE | O_DIRECTORY | O_NOFOLLOW |
> + O_NOATIME | O_CLOEXEC | O_RANDOM |
> + FMODE_EXEC | FMODE_NONOTIFY));
> +
I cannot test it, but given O_RDONLY is 0, are you sure 20 bits are actually set ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-06 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-06 6:55 [PATCH] fs: O_* bit numbers uniqueness check Wu Fengguang
2010-01-06 7:07 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2010-01-06 7:20 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-06 9:13 ` Andreas Schwab
2010-01-09 13:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-06 7:08 ` Roland Dreier
2010-01-06 7:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Wu Fengguang
2010-01-06 7:30 ` Roland Dreier
2010-01-06 7:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-06 16:20 ` [PATCH] " Jamie Lokier
2010-01-09 13:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-01-06 15:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-01-09 13:52 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B443695.5090301@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).