From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@googlemail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for hweight_long(CONSTANT)
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:28:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B758FC0.1020600@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100212170649.GC3114@aftab>
On 02/12/2010 09:06 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 09:33:49AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> You don't do the push/pop inline -- if you're going to take the hit of
>> pushing this into the caller, it's better to list them as explicit
>> clobbers and let the compiler figure out how to do it. The point of
>> doing an explicit push/pop is that it can be pushed into the out-of-line
>> subroutine.
>
> Doh! Of course, this was wrong. See below.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/hweight.c b/arch/x86/lib/hweight.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9b4bfa5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/hweight.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> +/* popcnt %rdi, %rax */
> +#define POPCNT ".byte 0xf3\n\t.byte 0x48\n\t.byte 0x0f\n\t.byte 0xb8\n\t.byte 0xc7"
> +#define REG_IN "D"
> +#define REG_OUT "a"
> +#else
> +/* popcnt %eax, %eax */
> +#define POPCNT ".byte 0xf3\n\t.byte 0x0f\n\t.byte 0xb8\n\t.byte 0xc0"
> +#define REG_IN "a"
> +#define REG_OUT "a"
> +#endif
> +
> +/*
> + * Those are called out-of-line in the alternative below and are added here only
> + * so that gcc is able to figure out which registers have been clobbered by
> + * __sw_hweightXX so that it could restore their values before returning from
> + * the __arch_hweightXX versions. See also <arch/x86/lib/Makefile>.
> + */
> +unsigned int _sw_hweight32(unsigned int w)
> +{
> + return __sw_hweight32(w);
> +}
> +
> +unsigned long _sw_hweight64(__u64 w)
> +{
> + return __sw_hweight64(w);
> +}
> +
> +unsigned int __arch_hweight32(unsigned int w)
> +{
> + unsigned int res = 0;
> +
> + asm (ALTERNATIVE("call _sw_hweight32", POPCNT, X86_FEATURE_POPCNT)
> + : "="REG_OUT (res)
> + : REG_IN (w));
> +
Now you have no clobbers and no assembly wrapper. That really doesn't work.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-12 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-30 9:45 [PATCH 0/5] [RESEND] FMODE_NONOTIFY and FMODE_NEG_OFFSET bits Wu Fengguang
2010-01-30 9:45 ` [PATCH 1/5] fanotify: fix FMODE_NONOTIFY bit number Wu Fengguang
2010-02-01 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2010-01-30 9:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for hweight_long(CONSTANT) Wu Fengguang
2010-02-01 20:48 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 13:39 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-03 15:08 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 15:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-03 15:42 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-03 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-03 17:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-03 18:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-03 18:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-03 19:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-04 15:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-04 15:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-04 15:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-04 16:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-05 12:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-05 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-05 21:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-06 9:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-07 1:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-08 9:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-08 9:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-08 9:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-11 17:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-11 17:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-12 17:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-12 17:28 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-02-12 17:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-12 19:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-17 13:57 ` Michal Marek
2010-02-17 17:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-17 17:31 ` Michal Marek
2010-02-17 17:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-17 17:39 ` Michal Marek
2010-02-18 6:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-19 14:22 ` [PATCH] x86: Add optimized popcnt variants Borislav Petkov
2010-02-19 16:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-19 16:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-19 16:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-22 14:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-22 17:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-22 18:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-22 19:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-23 6:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-23 15:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-23 17:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-23 17:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-23 18:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-23 19:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-26 5:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-26 7:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-26 17:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-27 8:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-27 20:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-03-09 15:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-09 15:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-09 16:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-09 16:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-09 17:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-09 17:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-18 11:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-03-18 11:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] bitops: Optimize hweight() by making use of compile-time evaluation Borislav Petkov
2010-03-18 11:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: Add optimized popcnt variants Borislav Petkov
2010-02-18 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/5] bitops: compile time optimization for hweight_long(CONSTANT) Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-18 11:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-14 10:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-14 11:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-14 12:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-02-14 14:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-14 18:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-14 20:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-02-14 22:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-04 15:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-04 15:39 ` Brian Gerst
2010-02-03 17:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-30 9:45 ` [PATCH 3/5] vfs: O_* bit numbers uniqueness check Wu Fengguang
2010-01-30 9:45 ` [PATCH 4/5] vfs: introduce FMODE_NEG_OFFSET for allowing negative f_pos Wu Fengguang
2010-01-30 9:45 ` [PATCH 5/5] devmem: dont allow seek to last page Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B758FC0.1020600@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=petkovbb@googlemail.com \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).