From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ric Wheeler Subject: Re: [Lsf10-pc] [ATTEND] I'd like to attend ;) Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 13:33:06 -0500 Message-ID: <4B8C0862.5020308@redhat.com> References: <4B8C027E.2090709@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lsf10-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27625 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751459Ab0CASbv (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:31:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B8C027E.2090709@redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/01/2010 01:07 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > I still need to decide which specific topic to bring/promote, but I'd certainly > like to attend, as I have in the past. > > Generally would like to talk about... > > Trim/discard plans in filesystem - lately I'm thinking a batch mechanism may > be better than trim-as-you-go. > > Advancements in generic test infrastructures since last year. > > Could talk a bit about the advancements in proper alignment detection& > setup for storage& filesystems but that's not a very big topic. > > Jan's suggestion of some writeback sanity sounds good to me too. > > Thanks, > -Eric > I think that all of the above are great topics for this time around. Specifically, the alignment work has been interesting in that we have tried to get not just the kernel bits but the entire stack to work properly. Both this and the discard work should still be quite topical if we can get the various storage vendors to evaluate our current upstream bits in time :-) ric