From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ric Wheeler Subject: Re: [Lsf10-pc] [ATTEND] I'd like to attend ;) Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:40:42 -0500 Message-ID: <4B8D155A.4030508@redhat.com> References: <4B8C027E.2090709@redhat.com> <4B8C0862.5020308@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Sandeen , lsf10-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Moyer Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:5706 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752946Ab0CBNkt (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:40:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/02/2010 08:37 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Ric Wheeler writes: > > >> On 03/01/2010 01:07 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> >>> I still need to decide which specific topic to bring/promote, but I'd certainly >>> like to attend, as I have in the past. >>> >>> Generally would like to talk about... >>> >>> Trim/discard plans in filesystem - lately I'm thinking a batch mechanism may >>> be better than trim-as-you-go. >>> >>> Advancements in generic test infrastructures since last year. >>> >>> Could talk a bit about the advancements in proper alignment detection& >>> setup for storage& filesystems but that's not a very big topic. >>> >>> Jan's suggestion of some writeback sanity sounds good to me too. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Eric >>> >>> >> I think that all of the above are great topics for this time around. >> >> Specifically, the alignment work has been interesting in that we have >> tried to get not just the kernel bits but the entire stack to work >> properly. >> >> Both this and the discard work should still be quite topical if we can >> get the various storage vendors to evaluate our current upstream bits >> in time :-) >> > As you know, I've been picking away at the discard support from the file > system all the way down to the storage. I think I should have some good > numbers and guidance come time for the workshop. > > I am also interested in discussing all things I/O scheduler. > > Oh, and I'd like to attend as well. ;) > > -Jeff > One topic that I think that might be interesting is to talk about how well we did integrating all of these new features into the stack that cross IO/FS/scheduler boundaries. In a way, we got ahead of the hardware vendors with both the discard support and the various topology bits but did manage to get that supported not just in the kernel but up the tool chain as well. Might be interesting to see where we ended up, think about next steps and if/how we would improve on what we have.... ric