From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boaz Harrosh Subject: Re: [pnfs] [GIT BISECT] first bad commit: 1f36f774 Switch !O_CREAT case to use of do_last() Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:58:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4BAA52A8.2080304@panasas.com> References: <4BAA3493.1030802@panasas.com> <20100324160037.GP30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <4BAA3828.2070506@panasas.com> <20100324160754.GQ30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <4BAA398C.5050901@panasas.com> <20100324163948.GR30031@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <4BAA48A3.1030801@panasas.com> <4BAA4CAC.6060104@panasas.com> <4BAA5035.1060906@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel , "J. Bruce Fields" , pNFS Mailing List , linux-kernel To: Al Viro Return-path: Received: from daytona.panasas.com ([67.152.220.89]:10254 "EHLO daytona.int.panasas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932629Ab0CXR6D (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:58:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4BAA5035.1060906@panasas.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/24/2010 07:47 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >>> On 03/24/2010 06:39 PM, Al Viro wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 06:10:52PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: >>>>> On 03/24/2010 06:07 PM, Al Viro wrote: >>>>>>>> Bloody impressive... Does that happen to underlying fs or to what you >>>>>>>> are seeing via NFS? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Only via NFS. All local access is fine. >>>>>>> Al hi Would you like to attempt a revert of this patch (or group of patches) Just to get rid of the thought that git bisect was just peeking the wrong guy. Maybe it's just something else? Can you understand the relevance of all this? (I'll try other setups as well but tomorrow, it's getting late out here) Thanks for your help Boaz