From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ric Wheeler Subject: Re: [Lsf10-pc] [ATTEND] i'd like to attend! Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:58:46 -0700 Message-ID: <4BC71B96.7040209@redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lsf10-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Sage Weil Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27904 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753902Ab0DON73 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:59:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04/14/2010 09:20 PM, Sage Weil wrote: > I don't have any urgent matters to discuss, but I would definitely like to > attend again this year. A few miscellaneous items: > > - I'd like to resurrect the 'statlite' proposal from the last lsf (with > patches, real soon now) > > - Generic interface for describing file striping for distributed file > systems (e.g. allowing easy data migration between ceph and lustre) > > - I'm interested in the vfs scalability work, as some of that will affect > some tomfoolery in ceph's dentry cache usage > > - I'm also interested in hear more about developments with the storage > side of things, now that we've built a distributed block device using > ceph's distributed object storage layer. > > Thanks! > sage > Thanks Sage for the submission. I think that your work on ceph and btrfs has been interesting and think that the ideas you list above are definitely worth discussing at LSF! Ric